follow Cyanbane at http://twitter.com



Windows Live Alerts

View Eric Thompson's profile on LinkedIn

Rock Star alter egos are growing in numbers
"You're forming a fake band -- that's what you do," says Sadri, calling the game "the best part of karaoke, adding in a drummer and guitars."
The Magpie Developer
Jeff Atwood is one of the best programmer/writers around. I love reading his stuff, some I agree wholeheartedly with, other stuff we disagree, but this post is about a dead-on as they come. This idea has been floating in my head for a long time, but it is hard for me to conceptualize it in words, Atwood does a brilliant job at it. Must read for any developer.
Andy Olmsted's Last Blog Entry.
(Warning: Pretty rough) No matter how you feel politically about the war, this reminds you that each number people throw around as statistics is a human life. This is extremely well written, and pretty rough on your soul towards the end, but something everyone should read. Its a shitty situation all around, but there is always a human face behind the statistics and I want to make sure I never forget that.
LSU scared of the prospect of some Moreno action?
Photos of Abandoned Swimming Pools
9 Things You Didn't Know About Rockband.
Drinking stories that put yours to shame
Via Keith


To preserve his body during the voyage home, the second-in-command stored Nelson's body in the ship's vat of rum and halted all liquor rations to the crew. Not a bad idea, but when the ship reached port, officials went to retrieve Nelson's body and found the vat dry.



Disregarding good taste (in every sense), the crew had been secretly drinking from it the entire way home. After that, naval rum was referred to as Nelson's Blood.
making vodka pills in 24 hours
Recently, Chef Fabian was experimenting further with the Adria/Torreblanca technique of making 'vodka pills.' I use this word to describe the process of making liquid-filled candies by pouring flavored alcohol syrups into cornstarch and letting it set until a hard outer shell forms.
Strategy Letter VI - joelonsoftware.com
As a programmer, thanks to plummeting memory prices, and CPU speeds doubling every year, you had a choice. You could spend six months rewriting your inner loops in Assembler, or take six months off to play drums in a rock and roll band, and in either case, your program would run faster. Assembler programmers don’t have groupies.

Entire Article is Dead On. A must read for anyone in the software biz.
Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village




 
 
 
 


(Monday, December 19)

This is a story about Billy Joe and Bobbie Sue.


NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- In an open letter to the Time Warner Inc. (TWX) (TWX) board, investor Carl Icahn questioned the company's agreement to sell 5% of its AOL Internet unit to Google Inc. (GOOG) (GOOG), warning that the move may be "short sighted" and a "blatant breach of fiduciary duty." In a press release Monday, Icahn, the founder of equity group Icahn Partners LP and known as an activist investor, said, "I...question whether Google is the best partner for unlocking the value of the AOL asset." Time Warner agreed to sell a 5% stake in AOL to Google for $1 billion cash in return for an advanced partnership between the two companies.
Huh? If I were Icahn and Google I would take a note from Steve Miller: Take the Money and Run I know the Big G has money all over the place, but 5% for 1Billion (a 20 billion value on AOL)? Maybe I am missing something but a company like AOL who was built on the fact that they provided a service (internet connectivity) when it was needed. Now, it is being eroded every single day by a new generation of connectivity (that AOL has yet to offer from what I know). But then an investor doesn't like a 20 billion dollar valuation of AOL? I don't think it is worth near that personally and I think this was a waste by G. If you take Y!/MSN/G* in a 3 way chess game, this was like Google sacrificing 3 pawns for a knight. In some cases it could make sense, but in most it doesn�t. Let Y! or MSN take the knight. But hey, if you are AOL, get as much as possible.


Brainstorm it:

Too funny... in chess terms 3 pawns for a knight is considered an even trade, you don't lose or gain from that transaction. Give up two pawns for a knight and now you are losing.

*sigh* I would give up my kingdom for a knight of the Poppy order.

Too funny... in chess terms 3 pawns for a knight is considered an even trade

I have always heard it is a give or take depending on the state of the board.

Because 3 Pawns can have more value than a knight sometimes strategically. If we played a game, and I took your c,d, and e pawns off the board in exchange for one of my knights I am pretty sure I would win. Pawn structure is very important for grabbing space and defending yourself. Knights, not so much.

Likewise, if you had your king and a knight left at the end game, and I had a king and 3 pawns you would be a fool not to trade the knight for the 3 pawns if you have the chance (and take the stalemate rather than the loss)
Pawns can potentially become better pieces, knights not so much.

On the flip side, lets say I set up an exchange where I grab your queen and have to give up a bishop and 2 pawns - giving me a material advantage. If a situation arose where I could exchange a knight for 3 pawns I would take it in a second, thereby increasing my material lead by taking equivalent points off the board. (Any time I take a noticable material lead I always play for attrition because they will run out of pieces before I do.)
 Your Thoughts?







www.flickr.com
Cyanbane's photos tagged with cbcom More of Cyanbane's photos tagged with cbcom




 

 
Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.
© Copyright 2003-2007, Eric Thompson